He creado este vídeo con el Editor de vídeo de YouTube (www.youtube.com/editor).
Full Professor Olle Johansson Meeting with Parents on EMFs worries and concerns and Law issues on October 20, 2015 in Barcelona (Spain).
Olle Johansson Ph.D, associate professor
The Experimental Dermatology Unit
Department of Neuroscience
Article by Professor Olle Johansson: “Health risk from wireless? The debate is over”
01.11.2014 by emily Category Electromagnetic Health Blog
The following article is by Associate Prof. Olle Johansson, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, and Associate Adj. Prof. Einar Flydal, Department of Telematics, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Health risk from wireless? The debate is over.
by Associate Prof. Olle Johansson
and Associate Adj. Professor Einar Flydal
25 April 2014
The debate on health risks from mobiles, wireless LANs, baby calls and other wireless equipment based on microwaves, is, in fact, over – at least from a professional health and biophysics perspective.
To continue with the articcle click HERE
Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity
Dimitris J. Panagopoulos, Olle Johansson & George L. Carlo
Scientific Reports 5, Article number: 14914 (2015)
Biological physics | Ion transport | Risk factors
24 February 2015
07 September 2015
12 October 2015
In the present study we analyze the role of polarization in the biological activity of Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs)/Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR). All types of man-made EMFs/EMR – in contrast to natural EMFs/EMR – are polarized. Polarized EMFs/EMR can have increased biological activity, due to: 1) Ability to produce constructive interference effects and amplify their intensities at many locations. 2) Ability to force all charged/polar molecules and especially free ions within and around all living cells to oscillate on parallel planes and in phase with the applied polarized field. Such ionic forced-oscillations exert additive electrostatic forces on the sensors of cell membrane electro-sensitive ion channels, resulting in their irregular gating and consequent disruption of the cell’s electrochemical balance. These features render man-made EMFs/EMR more bioactive than natural non-ionizing EMFs/EMR. This explains the increasing number of biological effects discovered during the past few decades to be induced by man-made EMFs, in contrast to natural EMFs in the terrestrial environment which have always been present throughout evolution, although human exposure to the latter ones is normally of significantly higher intensities/energy and longer durations. Thus, polarization seems to be a trigger that significantly increases the probability for the initiation of biological/health effects.
How to cite this article: Panagopoulos, D. J. et al. Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity. Sci. Rep. 5, 14914; doi: 10.1038/srep14914 (2015).
Videotaped by Noé Marcial
Edited by Asociación Oikos Ambiental